A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving potential neighbours around the construction of a wall at a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, seek out to construct their loved ones residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven citizens. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being built by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their internet site, leading to an encroachment on the Unique Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal preparing disputes, exactly where views of the sea are both extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced from the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture that has because become emblematic of your intensity of the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they have been meant to Get visual proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two men entered the drinking water throughout intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm drinking water to photograph the site turned Just about the most hanging descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into an area influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been covered in detail because of the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as viewers sought Rene Collier and Paul Feely to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt development pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital minute within the authorized timeline.
For the Main of the dispute is a disagreement around boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as built, goes over and above what was authorized and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of setting up paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up on the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is determined by issue for environmental security and adherence to planning legislation. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving a private view, insisting alternatively that it's about making certain that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got explained their prolonged-standing connection to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply looking to build a household home in accordance Along with the law. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that all will work are already carried out determined by Qualified guidance and authorised plans. Their lawyers have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the remarkable steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with getting into the sea all through a storm, usually do not change the fundamental facts.
The situation has also raised broader questions on how preparing disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute in excess of design of wall at coastal website has grown to be a shorthand description for a problem that lots of observers see as progressively frequent. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation between personal land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become far more contentious.
The Irish Instances article about René Collier pointed out which the businessman had Formerly been involved in local advocacy on arranging and environmental challenges, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly different professional backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site with the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-high water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of midsection-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting both of those the Bodily actuality from the coastline as well as the symbolic mother nature with the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an too much strategy.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom ought to ascertain whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell along with each other long once the authorized expenses have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case extend outside of that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. In addition, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems for instance environmental safety and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre of the dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful queries. No matter if it'll eventually be altered, taken off, or done as planned will rely on the court’s results. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.